www.rfu.com
link to this article
|
The Rugby Football Union has re-emphasised its commitment to player safety with the publication of its five-year (1997-2002) review of injuries. It has stressed that player care is an integral part of the training it provides for the coaches and administrators who work with the 490,000 participants in rugby each week in England. The review of serious and very serious injuries reported by clubs and school is the second carried out by the RFU following its 1992-97 report. Terry Burwell, the RFU’s Community Rugby and Operations Director, said: "While contact sports will inevitably produce some very serious injuries, the percentage of those in rugby union in England, in relation to the numbers playing, is relatively small. "There are two to three very serious neck injuries which lead to tetraplegia in 17.6 million player/game involvements during a season. "This is a player-centred game. That is why we are investing so much of our time, energy and resources into coach development and education. "Everybody should be confident in the knowledge that the RFU and those who are dealing with players of all ages and abilities are taking due cognisance of the duty of care requirements of any player. "It is about ensuring that we have an exciting dynamic product that people want to play but also a safe, secure environment in which to participate. At the top of list when we are vetting, training and working with our coaches is care of the player." Part of that duty is the correct procedure for dealing with concussion injures, which have slightly decreased in reports by clubs over the past five years. Any player who suffers concussion must not participate in a match or training session for three weeks from the time of the injury and then only when declared symptom free by a recognised medical practitioner. "Clubs and schools know the requirements of not playing for three weeks after injuries of this nature," added Burwell. "We would be extremely concerned if that person was then asked to play before the end of that period. We would take disciplinary action against anyone who was found not to be acting in the best interests of the player."
|